I'm still working on getting my notes from Museums and the Web in Montreal online.
These are notes from the questions at the 'Beyond Single Repositories' session. This session was led by Ross Parry, and included the papers Learning from the People: Traditional Knowledge and Educational Standards by Daniel Elias and James Forrest and The Commons on Flickr: A Primer by George Oates.
This clashed with the User-Generated Content session that I felt I should see for work, but I managed to sneak in at the end of Ross's session. I expected this room to be packed, but it wasn't. I guess the ripples of user-generated content and Web 2.0-ish stuff are still spreading beyond the geeks, and the pebbles of single repositories and the semantic web have barely dropped into the pond for most people. As usual, all mistakes are mine - if you asked a question and I haven't named you or got your question wrong, drop me a line.
Quite a lot of the questions related to 'The Commons'.
There was a question about the difference between users who download and retain context of images, versus those who just download the image and lose all context, attribution, etc. George: Flickr considered putting the metadata into EXIF but it was problematic and wasn't robust enough to be useful.
Another question: how to link back to institution from Flickr? George: 'there's this great invention called the hyperlink'. And links can also go to picture libraries to buy prints.
[I need to check this but it could really help make the case for Commons in museums if that's the case. We might also be able to target different audiences with different requirements - e.g. commercial publications vs school assignments. I also need to check if Flickr URLs are permanent and stable.]
Seb Chan asked: how does business model of having images on Flickr co-exist with existing practices?
Flickr are cool with museums putting in content at different resolutions - it's up to institution to decide.
"It's so easy to do things the correct way" so please teach everyone to use CC licence stuff appropriately.
Issues are starting to be raised about revenue sharing models.
[I wonder if we could put in FOI requests to find out exactly how much revenue UK museums make from selling images compared to the overhead in servicing commercial picture libraries, and whether it varies by type of image or use. It'd be great if we could put some Museum of London/MoLAS images on Commons, particularly if we could use tagging to generate multilingual labels and re-assess images in terms of diversity - such an important issue for our London audiences; or to get more images/objects geo-located. I also wonder if there are any resourcing issues for moderation requirements, or do we just cope with whatever tags are added?]
Update: following the conference, Frankie Roberto started a discussion on the Museums Computer Group list under the subject 'copyright licensing and museums'. You have to be a member to post but a range of perspectives and expertise would really help move this discussion on.